Behind the Scenes in California

Producers Beck and Kara joined me here on the best coast for shoots and interviews in LA and SF last week. Here are some behind the scenes snaps…

DARPA and Brain Machine Interfaces

From a long New Yorker feature:

“Since its inception, darpa had asked if computers could be more closely coupled with minds. But its interest in embedding electronics directly in the cortex emerged only after the N.I.H. workshops demonstrated that the technology was mature enough. In 2002, the agency created a program, called Brain-Machine Interfaces, which laid a scientific foundation for the development of cognitive implants that could enhance soldiers. “The human is becoming the weakest link in Defense systems,” the agency noted—implying that biology itself needed an upgrade. A darpa official speaking at an agency symposium encouraged attendees to visualize soldiers who could act as human lie detectors, or communicate by computer-aided telepathy.

By 2003, darpa had spent millions of dollars on Brain-Machine Interfaces. But in the post-9/11 political climate—following a controversial darpa surveillance program, along with the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq—the agency’s leadership sought to redefine its goals. The head of darpa’s Defense Sciences Office at the time told me, “We had this interest in being able to move things with the brain, and it didn’t look like anyone was going to be too excited about flying airplanes with the technology.” The country was at war, and many soldiers returning from the front with missing arms were using replacements that were little more than hooks—technology that would have been recognizable during the Civil War. darpa reasoned that it should focus its investment in brain-machine technology on making the wounded whole, rather than on building super-warriors. “Frankly, it made it easier,” the official said. “If someone said, ‘Why are you spending all this money?,’ it was kind of a dual-purpose thing. How could you argue we shouldn’t be?” darpa officials arranged for their director to visit Walter Reed Army Medical Center, to meet soldiers who had lost their arms. Moved by the experience, he committed more than a hundred million dollars to a new program, called Revolutionizing Prosthetics.”

To Whom Do We Want To Be Accountable?

Jotting down notes on to whom we want to be accountable as a success metric, before we put anything out in the world…

Elise: Future learners (see previous post)

Kara: Making the future accessible for people who haven’t been curious about it before. How the tries is easily explained so people can understand it.

CJ: Peers — animators and people of color. Representation in front of and behind the camera matters. “It’s important to tell others that we have women of color doing this show and calling the shots.” On animators, a lot of people are interested in bringing animators and journalism together and this is my way of digging into the future, saying, “You can be an animator in news, you can animate for the radio!”

Nick: I don’t think we need to make something FOR the npr.org audience, but I think this is a place to figure out other platforms that this can get on. Apple News, Facebook — how it should work best on FB, and then we’re hoping there’s enough there there to elevating the concept to an OTT service (Netflix, Hulu). Being insider enough, but not so deep in the weeds.

A central ambition: We are trying to be representative of the future, cover the future and speak to and target the future.